Where does marine life thrive in the Baltic Sea, and how might its distribution change as the climate warms?
PROTECT BALTIC is turning species observations and environmental data into regional maps to help answer these questions.
Work Package 3 (WP3) has developed Baltic-wide species distribution models (SDMs), mapped ecological communities and habitats, and identified potential biodiversity hotspots under present and future conditions. These outputs provide evidence to support marine protection, restoration, and maritime spatial planning.
This work has been led by Roland Pesch at Jade University of Applied Sciences, with contributions from HELCOM Secretariat, the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), the Finnish Environment Institute (Syke), the Estonian Marine Institute at the University of Tartu (UTARTU), and the Geological Survey of Sweden (SGU).
Researchers combined records of where species have been observed with information on water depth, salinity, temperature, oxygen levels and seabed substrate. They used this information to predict where benthic invertebrates, macrophytes and fish are likely to occur across the Baltic Sea.
They used 52 predictors and produced distribution maps for 630 species at a spatial resolution of 250 x 250 metres, providing a more detailed picture than was available before the project. This includes maps for:
The models have been tested against species observations, and experts have reviewed their ecological plausibility. Confidence scores for each species help users understand how reliable the results are.
To provide a more complete picture of Baltic Sea biodiversity, the team also incorporated distribution models for 76 bird species from eBird and four marine mammals (grey seal, harbour seal, ringed seal and harbour porpoise) from the OBAMA-NEXT and SAMBAH projects.
These datasets complement the models and contribute to a broader understanding of species distributions and their relationships with marine habitats.
Using the high-confidence SDMs, the team identified groups of species that tend to occur together. Through cluster analysis, informed by salinity zones and expert review, the team identified 27 ecological community types. The maps also incorporate information on seabed substrates and mobile species associated with each community.
These outputs can help define ecological protection targets, assess biodiversity, map ecosystem services and their benefits to people, and identify priority areas for protection. They offer a Baltic-wide perspective that complements more detailed local surveys.
Knowing where biodiversity occurs is only part of the picture. Understanding how human activities affect marine ecosystems is equally important for identifying where protection and management efforts are most needed.
Activities such as shipping, fishing, offshore energy production and coastal development generate pressures ranging from underwater noise and pollution to physical disturbance of the seabed. These pressures can overlap, potentially affecting species and habitats in different ways.
To better understand these relationships, PROTECT BALTIC has compiled approximately 12,000 spatial layers relating to human activities, pressures and their potential impacts. This extensive evidence base supports the development of more detailed assessments of where human activities may affect marine biodiversity.
Building on methods used in previous HELCOM holistic assessments, the project has also updated the Spatial Pressure and Impact Assessment (SPIA) Tool. The tool combines 17 harmonised pressure layers with distribution data for more than 700 species and information on their sensitivity to different pressures.
Users can explore individual pressures or assess their potential cumulative impacts on species and habitats. The spatial resolution has also been increased from 1 km to 250 metres, allowing a more detailed examination of where pressures overlap with biodiversity and where management measures may be needed.
Developed as an open-source QGIS plug-in, SPIA allows users to carry out their own assessments using regional datasets or their own spatial information. The results show relative patterns of potential pressure and impact rather than direct measurements of ecological damage, and should be interpreted alongside monitoring data and expert knowledge.
Using climate projections from the RCO-SCOBI model, the team has explored how species distributions could change during the periods 2040–2060 and 2080–2100 under two scenarios: one with intermediate greenhouse gas emissions and one with very high emissions.
The future models cover 94 fish, 179 benthic invertebrate and 153 macrophyte species, and show where suitable conditions could expand, contract or shift as the Baltic Sea changes.
The team has also mapped potential biodiversity hotspots using present-day predictions for 706 species, including fish, benthic invertebrates, macrophytes and birds. The analysis considers both predicted species richness and the relative rarity of species, helping identify areas that may be particularly important for biodiversity protection. Future projections also help explore how these priority areas could change as environmental conditions shift.
It is important to note that the maps show modelled patterns, not definitive outcomes. Gaps and uneven coverage in species observations, differences between climate models, and assumptions about future nutrient inputs all introduce uncertainty. The maps should therefore be used alongside expert judgement and detailed local evidence.

